Simon Says Casino

Simon Says Casino is a Rival Gaming brand that was known for simple bonus claims, a slots-heavy lobby, and a VIP program with cashback perks. That said, there is one major update readers should know right away: Simon Says Casino was reported closed in April 2024. This review looks at how the site operated, what it offered, and where it stood before shutting down.

For players researching older Rival brands, this breakdown can still be useful. It gives you a clear picture of the casino’s banking setup, software, bonus terms, and the practical details that mattered most before signing up.

The Big Update Players Should Know First

Simon Says Casino is not an active option for real-money play anymore. According to the available research, the casino was reported closed in April 2024.

That matters because many review pages for older online casinos stay online long after a brand stops operating. If you came here looking for a place to register and play, the key takeaway is simple: Simon Says Casino should be treated as a historical review, not a current recommendation.

Another important point for American readers is that the casino did not accept players from the United States while it was operating. So even before the reported closure, it was not a US-facing online casino.

What Simon Says Casino Offered at a Glance

Before it closed, Simon Says Casino ran on Rival Gaming software. Rival-powered casinos typically leaned heavily on downloadable casino platforms and instant-play access, and Simon Says followed that same model.

The casino supported several common payment methods, including ACH, Visa, MasterCard, and Neteller. It also listed support for multiple currencies, including USD, EUR, GBP, AUD, and ZAR, which gave it broader international appeal than many smaller Rival brands.

Support options included email at “support@simonsayscasino.com,” plus phone lines for the UK and international customers. On paper, that gave players a few ways to contact the site, although the overall transparency of the brand had some clear weak spots, especially around bonus terms.

A Closer Look at the Welcome Bonus

The brand listing attached to Simon Says Casino shows a welcome bonus of 125% up to $250. In practice, the casino appears to have used a broader welcome package with more than one offer attached to early deposits.

The first deposit bonus was a 125% match up to $200, with a 15x wagering requirement on the bonus amount. Slots counted 100% toward playthrough, while table games did not count at all.

The second deposit bonus offered a 100% match up to $200, again with a 15x wagering requirement. The third deposit returned to 125% up to $200 and added a $10 free gift. Players who completed all three deposit offers were also moved into the “Lord” level of the casino’s VIP club.

There was also a no-deposit free chip tied to the welcome package at certain times. Reports show a $20 free bonus was common, though some periods featured a $50 free offer instead. That no-deposit bonus carried a much steeper 40x wagering requirement and was limited to slots.

The No-Deposit Offer Had More Strings Attached

At first glance, a free chip with no deposit required sounds attractive. The problem is that Simon Says Casino did not make all of its terms easy to review in advance.

Instead of posting full bonus details clearly on the public site, the casino reportedly showed many of the key rules only in the cashier during the claim process. That made it harder for players to compare offers or spot limitations before opening an account.

The no-deposit bonus also came with cashout restrictions. In some cases, exclusive free-chip promos had a maximum cashout cap of $120. That does not automatically make the bonus bad, but it does reduce the practical value quite a bit compared with a standard cash bonus that lets you keep larger winnings after meeting playthrough.

Monthly Promos and Referral Perks

Simon Says Casino did not stop at the welcome package. It also offered recurring promotions, including a monthly match bonus of 100% up to $50.

That monthly offer carried a 20x wagering requirement on the bonus amount. After players finished the promotion, either by using the bonus or meeting the rules for withdrawal, they could also receive an extra $10 free.

The site also ran a refer-a-friend deal. Under that setup, the referring player could get $50, while the referred friend could receive $20 once the new player registered and deposited at least $50.

These promos added some variety, but again, the biggest weakness was transparency. A casino can advertise several good-looking offers, but if players have to wait until the cashier screen to see the actual restrictions, that is not ideal.

How the Bonus Rules Really Worked

One of the more important details with Simon Says Casino was that bonuses were described as cashable rather than sticky. That means that after the wagering requirement was fully met, both the bonus money and winnings linked to it could be withdrawn.

That structure is usually more player-friendly than sticky bonus systems. Still, the actual value depended on the promotion you claimed, the game you played, and the cashout cap attached to that offer.

Slots contributed 100% toward wagering requirements. Table games contributed 0%, which is a major limitation if you prefer blackjack, roulette, or other non-slot titles. Since Rival casinos often push slot play heavily, this setup was not surprising, but it definitely narrowed the bonus value for players who wanted more game variety.

VIP Club and Cashback Perks

Simon Says Casino had an eight-tier loyalty program called Simon’s Society. The levels were Member, Knight, Lord, Bishop, Baron, Queen, King, and Secret Society.

Most of the higher tiers came with monthly cashback, comp point boosts, a 20% reload bonus, and a recurring $10 freebie. Cashback reportedly ranged from 7.5% at lower VIP levels up to 30% for top players.

The VIP angle was one of the more interesting parts of the brand. Players who completed the first three welcome deposit offers were automatically upgraded to the Lord tier, which included 10% monthly cashback and a 2x comp-point multiplier. For regular slot players, that could have made the ongoing rewards package more appealing than the initial signup bonus alone.

Banking Options and Withdrawal Limits

Simon Says Casino listed ACH, Visa, MasterCard, and Neteller among its payment methods. That gave players a decent mix of card, e-wallet, and bank-related options.

The minimum deposit and minimum withdrawal were both set at $25, or the equivalent in supported currencies. From a player standpoint, that was fairly standard and not especially restrictive.

The bigger issue was cashout speed and withdrawal structure. Withdrawal requests reportedly sat in a pending state for up to two business days before processing. On top of that, the casino enforced a daily cashout limit of $2,000 and a weekly limit of $4,000.

For casual players, those limits might not have been a major problem. For bigger winners, though, the caps could slow down access to funds. It was also reported that the casino did not offer a withdrawal lock or manual flush feature, which meant pending withdrawals could potentially be reversed.

Game Selection and Software Quality

Because Simon Says Casino ran on Rival Gaming, its game selection was built around the Rival ecosystem. That usually meant a core focus on online slots, with some table games included in the mix.

The research also shows that Simon Says Casino did not offer progressive jackpots and did not run tournaments. It also did not feature live dealer games. So if you were looking for a modern casino with live blackjack, huge network jackpots, or regular leaderboard promos, this brand would have felt limited even before it closed.

That said, players who specifically liked older Rival slots may have found the lobby familiar. If you want to compare how other casinos from the same software family were structured, you can check our guide to Rival casinos.

Licensing and Trust Questions

Simon Says Casino was operated by Silverstone Overseas Limited and held a Curacao eGaming license, listed as 8048/JAZ 2011-0012. That gave the casino an offshore regulatory base rather than oversight from any US state regulator.

For American readers, that distinction is important. Offshore licensing does not offer the same player protections, complaint channels, or regulatory standards you would expect from a legal operator in a regulated US market.

The trust issue was also affected by the way bonus terms were handled. When a casino does not publish full promotional rules openly on the site, that raises fair questions about transparency. Even if the offers themselves are not terrible, players should never have to do extra digging just to understand core restrictions.

Who Simon Says Casino Was Best Suited For

Before it shut down, Simon Says Casino was mainly suited to international slot players who were comfortable with offshore brands, Rival software, and cashier-activated promotions. It was not a strong fit for players who wanted live dealer games, table-game bonus value, jackpot hunting, or highly transparent terms.

It also was not an option for US players. The casino restricted the United States, Canada, and many other jurisdictions, which sharply limited its reach.

If your goal is to find brands that better match the standards of today’s market, especially with stronger visibility around terms and payment processing, Simon Says Casino feels more like a snapshot of an older offshore casino model than a site that would stand out now.

The Bottom Line on Simon Says Casino

Simon Says Casino had a few decent selling points during its run, including cashable bonuses, a multi-step welcome package, ACH support, and a VIP club with monthly cashback. But it also had some notable drawbacks, such as poor bonus transparency, slot-only wagering contribution, no live dealer games, no jackpots, and fairly tight withdrawal limits.

Most importantly, the casino was reported closed in April 2024, and it was never available to players in the United States anyway. For that reason, this is best viewed as a reference review of a former Rival Gaming brand, not a current casino option worth pursuing.